Dec
23

US Dept. of State Statistics on EB-5 Visa Usage Indicate Backlog in FY2014 is Likely

eb-5usageWill there be retrogression of EB-5 Visas in 2014?

It was a year ago to the month, in the December 2012 U.S. Department of State (“State”) “Visa Bulletin” that informs the public of the availability of visa categories for that particular month, that the EB-5 industry was warned that based on then current demand patterns it was likely that the availability of EB-5 visas for investors from China with I-526 approvals (and their spouse and children under 21) would be backlogged due.  The reason for this is a combination of: the total number of visa available annually to all employment-based immigrant visa categories, the number of EB-5 visas available annually, and the per country caps per category once its annual allocation has been exhausted.  With 8,567 of the annual EB-5 visa allocation of 10,000 issued in fiscal year (FY) 2013, the December 2012 warning from State never came to fruition in FY2013.  However, recently reported data from Chief of the State’s Visa Controls Office, Charles Oppenheim, indicates that it is unlikely (absent Congressional action) we can avoid a backlog in availability of EB-5 views to investors and family from China in FY2014.

In just the first couple of months of FY2014, 4,748 EB-5 are spoken for already.  That number is up 50.2% in the same period as last year.  With the prospect of “retrogression” (the technical term for a backlog in visa availability) looming as the EB-5 industry moves toward the 10,000 visa quota, there are several wide ranging implications that IIUSA members should pay close attention to. From an immigration standpoint, the investor’s ability to file for Adjustment of Status or Consular Processing will be delayed as a result of a backlog of I-526 petitions, which would lead to Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) considerations for “age out” situations. For Regional Centers, job creation and capital redemption timelines will be impacted by a lag in visa approvals. Also, such a delay would create issues with funds sitting in escrow, potentially leading to concerns regarding project development and whether the EB-5 capital will be available when needed. From a securities perspective, new risk factors for private placement memoranda (PPMs) would arise as a result of retrogression. Issuers will have to disclose the potential risks associated with the new reality. Lastly, other country’s with immigrant investor programs will use retrogression to compete with EB-5.

With the issue long on our collective radar, so to speak, IIUSA has been hard at work advocating for relief from this situation.  The comprehensive immigration reform legislation that passed this Senate in June 2013 would improve the situation in three ways, as part of broader changes to employment-based visa categories: (1) recapturing unused visas since 1990 (which likely won’t be too many since EB-5 visas unused in previous years likely “spilled up” to higher employment-based preference categories); (2) eliminating per country caps; and, (3) only counting the principal visa applicant towards the annual visa allocation.  The SKILLS Act in the House has similar provisions.  Now the question is whether the House will pass immigration reform in 2014, and if so, will the legislation be conferenced with the Senate bill and result in a new law.  With 2014 mid-terms elections just ahead, time is of the essence for communities like the EB-5 industry who would benefit from reform.  There is also likely to be a stand-alone EB-5 reform bill introduced in the Senate in the near future, which will provide another opportunity to achieve our collective goal of an EB-5 Program with maximum capacity for economic impact.

Stay tuned for more information on this topic, which IIUSA is monitoring closely.  We hosted a webinar last year featuring Mr. Oppenheim from State, IIUSA VP Robert Divine, and IIUSA President Emeritus Stephen W. Yale-Loehr – which will be made available OnDemand in the near future  - and will host another webinar on the topic in 2014.  In the meantime, click to read Tammy Fox-Isicoff and H. Ronald Klasko’s article “The Impact of Chinese Quote Retrogression on EB-5 Investors and EB-5 Investments”, which was published in IIUSA’s June edition of the Regional Center Business Journal.

Print Friendly

Speak Your Mind

*